Online Hearing – Simplifying the US Sentencing Guidelines (Oct. 1996)
Full Document (Searchable PDF with bookmarks at every subject)
List of subjects discussed in email exchanges:
- Eleanor Kerlow, introduction and agenda
- Alan L. Zegas – Guideline Background
- Personal Experience with Guidelines (various responses)
- Good or Bad Precedent?
- Relevant Conduct
- Departing from the Guidelines
- Drug Guideline Offense Levels
- Probation Department as Thorn
- Calculations and Predictions
- Secret Sentencing Letters
- 11th Circuit Cocaine Ruling
- ADM Plea
- Loss Calculations
- Acceptance of Responsibility
- A stacked desk?
- Unfair to Poor, Minorities?
- Overriding Question
- What Should We Expect?
- Formulaic Mish Mosh
- Simplification Proposals
- Trap For the Unwary
- Mandatory Minimums & Guidelines
- Simplify via Expert System?
- One District Judge’s View
The full document includes contributions from:
- Fred Warren Bennett, PAG
- Joe Brown, US Attorney, Middle District of Tennessee
- Samuel Buffone, PAG
- Stanley Harris, Judge; District of Columbia
- Lawrence Lustberg
- Marc Mauer, Assistant Director; The Sentencing Project
- Julie O’Sullivan, Associate Professor of Law; Georgetown University Law Center
- Ronald Wright, Professor; Wake Forest University School of Law
- David Yellin; Professor, Hofstra University School of Law
- Jim Bishop, Deputy Chief Probation Officer; Middle District of Florida
- Tom Hutchinson, Chief, Sentencing Guidelines Group; Federal Public and Community Defenders
- Joe Whitley, former US Attorney
- Daniel J. Freed, Clinical Professor Emeritus of Law and Administration at Yale Law School