Online Hearing – Simplifying the US Sentencing Guidelines (Oct. 1996)

Full Document (Searchable PDF with bookmarks at every subject)

List of subjects discussed in email exchanges:

  • Eleanor Kerlow, introduction and agenda
  • Alan L. Zegas – Guideline Background
  • Personal Experience with Guidelines (various responses)
  • Good or Bad Precedent?
  • Relevant Conduct
  • Departing from the Guidelines
  • Drug Guideline Offense Levels
  • Probation Department as Thorn
  • Calculations and Predictions
  • Secret Sentencing Letters
  • 11th Circuit Cocaine Ruling
  • ADM Plea
  • Loss Calculations
  • Acceptance of Responsibility
  • A stacked desk?
  • Unfair to Poor, Minorities?
  • Overriding Question
  • What Should We Expect?
  • Formulaic Mish Mosh
  • Simplification Proposals
  • Trap For the Unwary
  • Mandatory Minimums & Guidelines
  • Simplify via Expert System?
  • One District Judge’s View

The full document includes contributions from:

  • Fred Warren Bennett, PAG
  • Joe Brown, US Attorney, Middle District of Tennessee
  • Samuel Buffone, PAG
  • Stanley Harris, Judge; District of Columbia
  • Lawrence Lustberg
  • Marc Mauer, Assistant Director; The Sentencing Project
  • Julie O’Sullivan, Associate Professor of Law; Georgetown University Law Center
  • Ronald Wright, Professor; Wake Forest University School of Law
  • David Yellin; Professor, Hofstra University School of Law
  • Jim Bishop, Deputy Chief Probation Officer; Middle District of Florida
  • Tom Hutchinson, Chief, Sentencing Guidelines Group; Federal Public and Community Defenders
  • Joe Whitley, former US Attorney
  • Daniel J. Freed, Clinical Professor Emeritus of Law and Administration at Yale Law School